WADIL Vs. BOARD OF REVENUE U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) - The petitioner is a defendant. The respondent no 4 filed a suit under section 229-B of the U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act for declaration of bhumidhari rights.

(2.) . After examining all the witnesses, the plaintiff closed his evidence. Four witnesses were also examined on behalf of the defendant. 28-10-1985 was fixed for further evidence of the defendant. On 27-10-1985 the petitioner met with an accident and his one leg was fractured, as a result of which he could not appear on 28-10-1985. However, on that date tbe court closed the defendant's evidence and fixed 30-10-1985 for arguments.

(3.) . The Sub-Divisional Officer rejected the said application on 14-11- 1985 holding that the ground for recalling the order was insufficient.