JAGDISH NARAIN TIWARI Vs. STATE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) S. R. Bhargava, J. Smt. Ram Janki loged F. I. R. against revisionists Jagdish Narayan Tiwari and Shyam for offence of rape under Section 386 I. P. C. case was investigated and it appears that statements of Ram Janki was recorded u/s 164 Cr. P. C. Smt. Ram Janki was subjected to medical examination. Investigating Officer submitted final report and dis believed the story of Ram Janki on the ground that she was not supported by medical evidence or the witnesses. Investigating Officer was further of the opinion that Ram Janki lodged false F. I. R. Hence he submitted charge-sheet for offence u/s 182 Cr. P. C. against Ram Janki.

(2.) THEN it appears that Ram Janki filed protest petition, Magistrate recorded state ments of Ram Janki and her witnesses Punni and Ram Baboo on oath. He replied upon the statement of Ram Janki u/s 164 Cr. P. C. and her statement alongwith statements of two witnesses recorded by the Magistrate. He concluded that there is sufficient material to proceed further against the revisionists. Hence he summoned the revisionists.

(3.) WITH the above directions and observations revision is disposed of finally.