JAGDISH YADAV Vs. SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner's father Sitar Ram Yadav was. a police constable in the Uttar Pradesh Police Force. After his death, the petitioner on completion of training at the Training Centre, Bahraich, was posted on duty at Bahraich from December, 1986 to 23-3-1987. From 23-3-1987 to 2-7- 1987 the petitioner was performing his duty at Azamgarh where his services have been terminated through annexure V dated 2-7-1987 attached with the writ petition. Aggrieved by the order the petitioner has approached this court under Article 226 of the Constitution.

(2.) THE main prayer of the petitioner in this writ petition is for quashing the order dated 2-7-1987 and for a direction to the respondents to reinstate the petitioner with immediate effect as police constable and to pay his all arrears of salary from 2-7-1987. Other general reliefs have also been claimed.

(3.) THE third contention raised on behalf of the petitioner is that in view of G. O. contained in Annexure IV attached with the writ petition, the petitioner was required to appear at the physical examination and interview and was not required to appear at any other examination, therefore, the termination of the petitioner's services on the alleged ground of using unfair means is wholly immaterial and irrelevant in the present case. ?