ISHWARI PRASAD Vs. COMMISSIONER JHANSI DIVISION

JUDGEMENT

(1.) - Against an order of bis suspension from the office of Pradhan under Sec. 95 (1) (gg) of the U. P. Panchyat Raj Act petitioner filed a revision before the Commissioner, Jhansi Division Jhansi and in that revision he also filed an application for Interim relief. Learned Commissioner vide impugned order dated 23-10-1990 has dismissed both the revision and the stay application on the ground that certified copy of the impugned order of suspension has not been filed along with revision and only its photostat copy has been filed. It is against this order that this writ petition has been filed before this Court.

(2.) AT the admission stage, I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned standing counsel and as no factual controversy is involved, the writ petition is being disposed of finally at the admission stage in accordance with the Rules of the Court.

(3.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner has stated that the petitioner will apply for certified copy of the order of the Sub-divisional Officer immediately. In case such an application is made by the petitioner, Sub-divisional Officer concerned shall issue certified copy within three days from the date of the receipt of the application for certified copy and thereafter the petitioner will file it before the Revisional Court.