(1.) M.P.Singh
(2.) PETITIONER is a tenant of a shop situate in Mohalla Singhan, Kashipur, district Nainital.
(3.) THE petitioner filed his written statement. His case was that he was a tenant at the rate of Rs. 200/-per year. His tenancy was annual. It was denied by him that there was no scope for business at Thakurdwara or it was a small rural colony. It was a good commercial centre and a developed town. THEre was good scope for the business at Thakurdwara which the landlord wanted to set up in the disputed shop at Kashipur.