PARVATI DEVI Vs. STATE OF U.P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Shri V.P. Srivastava for revisionist and Shri P.S. Adhikari for State.

(2.) THIS revision against summoning order under Section 319 Cr.P.C. has arisen in the following circumstances :-

(3.) THEN the only question which requires determination in this case is whether on the basis of evidence that revisionists are partners in the firm can make out a prima facie case of contravention of aforesaid orders punishable under Section 3 read with Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act.