(1.) -At the time of initial hearing of this civil revision, the Court was pleased to direct that the applicant may serve the respondents, so that the court may have the version of the respondents also. Sri S. K. Mehrotra has tiled his appearance before this court and the Civil Revision has been argued on merits.
(2.) HEARD the counsel for the parties.
(3.) AFTER hearing the counsel for the parties, I am of the opinion that the court below was perfectly correct and justified in ' allowing the revision. By allowing the revision, the court below had taken into consideration all the necessary relevant facts and clearly held that it would not amount to changing the nature of the suit or allowing a time barred relief. It is settled law that amedment sought for are generally to be allowed unless it is malafide or suffers with impediments as pointed out above.