KHACHERU Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) R. K. Saxena, J. This revision against conviction under Section 25 of the Arms Act is pressed only on the question of sentence. Sri R. P. Tripathi, counsel for the State Government is present. It is not necessary to summon the record and the matter can be conveniently disposed of after perusal of the judgments of the courts below from which certain circumstances spell out and can be reasonably taken into consideration.

(2.) THERE are two revisionists and each was, after usual trial convicted under Section 25 of the Arms Act with a sentence of rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and fine to the tune of Rs. 300. 00.

(3.) EACH revisionist has remained in jail for about four months in this crime which is in my opinion, sufficient punishment for the first offence committed by them.