LAWS(ALL)-1990-7-74

MAJJO Vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ASSESSMENT

Decided On July 23, 1990
SHRIMATI MAJJO Appellant
V/S
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner is challenging the validity of a notice issued under Section 281B of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

(2.) THE petitioner is not a regular assessee. Her land was acquired under a notification issued under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act on May 9, 1976. THE declaration under Section 6(1) was published on June 4, 1976, and the award passed on September 5, 1984. THE petitioner says that possession of land was taken on March 25, 1980. According to law, it is that date on which the property passes to the Government. THE petitioner is, however, not in a position to state when she actually received the compensation. Be that as it may, it appears that she put the compensation received by her in a bank in the form of fixed deposits and in a savings bank account, namely, in the Allahabad Bank, Tejgarhi, Meerut. On December 1, 1988, the bank informed the petitioner that the said F. D. R. and S. B. account has been attached by the Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle II, Meerut, through his letter dated September 28, 1988. THE petitioner came to this court by way of a writ petition on January 9, 1989..

(3.) WE do not, however, think it necessary to examine the said contention for the reason that the total period for which extensions can be granted under Section 281B is two years and that period has also expired on and with August 19, 1989. It is thus clear that the attachment under Section 281B cannot survive beyond the said date, namely, beyond August 19, 1989.