PARWATI DEVI Vs. IVTH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE BULANDSHAHR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) PETITIONERS are the tenants of the shop in question.

(2.) OM Prakash, opposite party No. 3, filed an application for release under Section 21 (1) (a) of U. P. Act No. 13 of 1972, hereinafter referred to as the Act, for release of the shop. The need set up by him was that his son Yogesh Kumar was un-employed. He was not highly educated. He wanted to set up a cloth business in the said shop. There was no other accommodation available to him. It was also alleged that initially Jwala Prasad, husband of petitioner No. 1 and father of petitioners No. 2 and 3 was the tenant. After his death his sons joined services at different places. Petitioner No. 1, the widow of Jwala Prasad was living with her sons. The shop in dispute is lying closed. His need was bonafide and genuine.

(3.) HEARD Sri B. D. Mandhyan, counsel for the petitioners and Sri Ajit Kumar, counsel for the respondent No. 3.