MARUTI KISHORE Vs. ANIL KUMAR BHASIN AND OTHERS

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner is a landlord. The decision of the District Judge was in favour of the landlord. This was impugned in Writ Petition No. 21134 of 1987; Anil Bhasin v. IX Additional District Judge. The decision of the prescribed authority was also in favour of the landlord. This was challenged in appeal under Section 21 of the U.P. Act No. XIII of 1972 before the District Judge. Against the judgment in the writ petition, dated 4 -10 -1988, a Special Leave Petition was filed before the Supreme Court. When the matter came up for consideration before the Supreme Court the resume of the proceedings are recorded as follows:

(2.) UPON hearing counsel, the court dismissed the special leave petition, but directed that the order of eviction shall not be executed on or before 30 -6 -1989 from today on the condition that the petitioner files an undertaking in this court within four weeks from today to the following effect:

(3.) FINDING that the undertaking has not been honoured, the landlord file this contempt petition upon which this court issued notices on 23 -1 -1990.