CITY BOARD MUSSOORIE Vs. STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is a Special Appeal by the City Board, Mussoorie, against the order of the learned Single Judge dismissing with costs its petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The Writ Petition is against the State Electricity Board, Lucknow (to be referred hereinafter as the Board), the State of Uttar Pradesh and the Central Electricity Authority, New Delhi (to be referred hereinafter as the Authority), with the prayers that a writ of certiorari be issued to quash the two Notifications dated 24-4-1962 and 30-9-1967, Annexures "A" and "B" to the Writ Petition, and also for a writ of mandamus to direct respondents Nos. 1 and 2 not to enforce the said Notifications against the peti tioner and further to direct respondent No. 1 not to realize 71% for supply of electric energy at a lower voltage of 6, 600 volts, and 20% surcharge imposed under the second Notification, and also the coal charges from the petitioner. A prayer was also made for the issue of a writ of mandamus to direct respon dent No. 1 to make the demand charges on the basis of the maximum demand, and not on the basis of the chargeable demand as contemplated by the two Notifications. In the end, it was pray ed that if the Grid Tariff framed by respondents Nos. 1 and 2 was not declared invalid, the petitioner be permit ted to make additional charge from all its consumers and further there be no discrimination and respondents Nos. 1 and 2 should charge from the consumers at the same rates as was permitted to be charged by the petitioner.

(2.) THE material facts of the case are that the petitioner. City Board, Mussoorie, has its generating station and supplies electricity to consumers in the cities of Mussoorie and Dehradun as a licensee under the Indian Electricity Act, 1910. As the demand for electric energy by the consumers increased, the petitioner approached the Electricity Department of the State of Uttar Pra desh, who agreed to supply to the Peti tioner electric energy in bulk at certain rates. The supply was taken by the petitioner at Patel Road Sub-Station at 6, 600 volts. Soon after this agreement with the Electricity Department the Board was constituted and it took over from the State Government the supply of electric energy to the petitioner. The petitioner is being supplied electric energy by the Board from the Ganga/Sarda Grid.

(3.) IN so far as the petitioner is concerned, the enhanced rates came into effect from December 1, 1967. The peti tioner is a licensee as defined in Sec tion 2 (6) of the Act, and being a local authority governed by Section 58 of the Act, could not raise its tariff without the sanction of the Board. The peti tioner, therefore, moved the State Government for permission to enhance the rates for supply of electric energy to consumers by 20%. No such sanction was given by the time the present Writ Petition was filed, but subsequently, on 20-4-1968, the petitioner was permitted to raise the charges for light and fan by two Paisas per unit which came to 6 or 7% of the original rates, and 10% for electric energy supplied for other pur poses.