(1.) THE short point for decision in this appeal is as to whether the suit in the instant case was barred by the provisions of Section 49 of the UP Consolidation of Holdings Act or not.
(2.) BRIEF facts giving rise to the appeal as disclosed from the record of the case is as follows:
(3.) THE learned Munsif on a consideration of the evidence on the record held that Section 49 of the UP Consolidation of Holdings Act barred the jurisdiction of the civil court to sit in judgment over the entries made during consolidation proceedings. According to him entries made during consolidation operation were conclusive in nature and he further held that sale deed of sirdari holding by Defendant No. 1 in favour of the Plaintiffs was void and created no title in the Plaintiffs. He accepted the sale in favour of the Defendant Nos. 2 to 4 to be valid accordingly dismissed the suit.