JAGANNATH Vs. UNITED PROVINCES

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This is an application for special leave to appeal against an order of the Tribunal of the Development Board of Kanpur. Along with the application for special leave memorandum of appeal was also field but on a court fee stamp of Rs. 3-12 only. The Stamp Reporter reported that the court fee on the memorandum of appeal was insufficient by Rs. 878.2-0, according to the valuation "if special leave to appeal is granted by the Court."

(2.) We granted special leave to appeal to the applicant on 30.10-1950. After we had granted the leave, Mr. S. N. Sahai, learned counsel for the appellant, prayed that time may be given to him for making good the deficiency on the memorandum of appeal. In view of the recent Full Bench decision of this Court, In the matter of the application of Wajid Ali v. Isar Bano, (A. I. R. (38) 1951 ALL. 64 F. B.), we thought that the applicant should give sufficient reasons why he did not file the memorandum of appeal with sufficient court-fee stamps. Learned counsel asked for time and the case was adjourned for to-day.

(3.) Learned counsel has drawn our attention to an order in F. A. No. 445 of 1946, passed by the Hon'ble Iqbal Ahmad C. J. In that case also, which was similar to present one, an application for special leave to appeal was asked for and it was prayed that the appellant be allowed to make good the deficiency of court-fee on the memorandum of appeal after the application for special leave to appeal had been decided. His Lordship observed as follows: