GENDAN LAL Vs. STATE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) These two references may be disposed of by the same judgment as they raise a common question of law for decision.

(2.) The applicant in each case has been convicted under Section 123, Motor Vehicles Act, for having contravened the provisions of Section 42 (1) of the Act, which provides that:

(3.) Applicant Gendan Lal has been convicted of another offence also, but I am not concerned with that offence in the reference in his case. I am concerned only with the conviction of the applicants in these two cases under Section 42/123, Motor Vehicles Act.