PINKEY RANI Vs. STATE OF U.P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Sri Anil Bhushan, learned Senior Counsel, assisted by Sri Sandeep Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Aditya Kesari, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents no.1 and 2 and Sri Prem Prakash Yadav, learned counsel for the respondents no.3 and 4.

(2.) It appears from perusal of the record that against the order dated 16.8.2019 passed by respondent no.3 in which name of the present petitioner stands at serial no.129, the writ petition was preferred by the petitioner along-with other similar situated persons being Writ A No.13224 of 2019 (Puspendra Kumar and 48 others Vs. State of U.P. and 5 others).

(3.) It is argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is also one of the petitioner in the aforesaid writ petition, the aforesaid writ petition was finally decided by a Coordinate Bench of this Court vide judgement and order dated 22.8.2019. The order dated 22.8.2019 passed in the aforesaid case is reproduced hereinbelow :-