LAWS(ALL)-2020-2-35

KULDEEP SINGH Vs. SUGAR CANE COMMSSIONER

Decided On February 11, 2020
KULDEEP SINGH Appellant
V/S
Sugar Cane Commssioner Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned counsels for parties and perused the record.

(2.) By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs:

(3.) Once it is admitted that petitioner was a Seasonal Parchi Distributor, he has no right and no provision could be shown that petitioner is entitled to be treated as a permanent Seasonal Parchi Distributor and the relief as prayed for cannot be granted.