REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

Prasad Seth Appellant

V/S

STATE OF U.P. Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

ROOKS VS. BARNARD [REFERRED TO]
LORD HAILSHAM IN CASSELL AND CO. LTD. VS. BROOME [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF KERALA VS. M PADMANABHAN NAIR [REFERRED TO]
O P GUPTA VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. M K GUPTA [REFERRED TO]
R KAPUR VS. DIRECTOR OF INSPECTION PAINTING AND PUBLICATION INCOME TAX [REFERRED TO]
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. SKIPPER CONSTRUCTION [REFERRED TO]
S R BHANRALE VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
COMMON CAUSE A REGISTERED SOCIETY VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
SHIVSAGAR TIWARI VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
UMA AGRAWAL VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. BALBIR SINGH [REFERRED TO]
GURPAL SINGH VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
S K DUA VS. STATE OF HARYANA [REFERRED TO]
RAJESHWAR SWARUP GUPTA VS. STATE OF U P [REFERRED TO]
Kavita Kumar VS. State of U.P [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Sri Nitin Khanna, learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for respondents.

(2.) The only grievance of petitioner is that Smt. Tara Dayalani wife of petitioner, was appointed as Mukhya Sevika, Bal Vikas Pariyojna Baldi Sarai, Sultanpur in 1984. She met an accident and died on 12.11.1995. However, her post-death dues, namely, Provident Fund, Gratuity and arrears of salary etc. were not paid, for which representations were made by petitioner, pursuant whereto Deputy Director, Bal Vikas Evam Pushtahar, U.P., Lucknow vide order dated 03.07.1998 (Annexure-8 to writ petition) directed District Programme Officer, Gonda to clear the outstanding dues of deceased, Tara Dayalani but even then the same has not bee paid.

(3.) In the counter affidavit filed by respondents I do not find any adequate justification for not making payment. On the contrary, in para 14 of counter affidavit it is admitted that dues of Smt. Tara Dayalani could not be released. Para 14 of counter affidavit reads as under:

Click here to view full judgment.

PRASAD SETH Vs. STATE OF U.P.

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address