ASHISH KUMAR DUBEY Vs. STATE OF U.P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Sri Gaurav Mehrotra, assisted by Sri Utsav Misra, learned counsel for the petitioners and Dr. Uday Veer Singh, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.

(2.) In both the writ petitions, the suspension orders, which have been passed mainly on the same allegation and issue, have been assailed and in the case of Ashish Kumar Dubey, the impugned order whereby his representation which was preferred in compliance of the order of this Court has been rejected and the order of transfer of petitioner-Ashish Kumar Dubey has been assailed, therefore, with the consent of the parties, both the writ petitions are being decided by a common order.

(3.) Notably, this Court has passed order dated 14. 2. 2020 in Service Single No. 2749 of 2020; Anand Kumar Sharma Vs. State of U. P. and others, wherein transfer order and order rejecting the representation of said petitioner, namely, Anand Kumar Sharma was assailed and this Court has decided said writ petition finally permitting the said petitioner to prefer a representation with the direction to decide the representation in a manner mentioned in the order dated 14. 2. 2020, therefore, for the purposes of transfer order in writ petition of Ashish Kumar Dubey, the order dated 14. 2. 2020 passed in the case of Anand Kumar Sharma (supra) shall cover the issue. For the brevity, the order dated 14. 2. 2020 passed in re; Anand Kumar Sharma (supra) is being reproduced herein below:-