REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

ARVIND KUMAR Appellant

V/S

STATE OF U.P. Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

JAGAT OHANDRA MOZUMDAR V. QUEEN EMPRESS [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR. VERSUS P.P. SHARMA AND ANR. [REFERRED TO]
HEM RAJ VS. STATE OF HARYANA [REFERRED TO]
GANGA PRASAD MAHTO VS. STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS [REFERRED TO]
RE: SHRIPAD G. CHANDAVARKAR [REFERRED TO]
RAMANATHAN CHETTIYAR V. K. SIVARAMA SUBRAHMANYA AYYAR [REFERRED TO]
R P KAPUR VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
R S RAGHUNATH VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [REFERRED TO]
ZANDU PHARMACEUTICAL WORKS LTD VS. SHARAFUL HAQUE [REFERRED TO]
M N OJHA VS. ALOK KUMAR SRIVASTAV [REFERRED TO]
FAHIM KHAN VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
SHANKAR SINGH GANDA SINGH VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
NRIPENDRA BHUSAN RAY VS. GOBINDA BANDHU MAJUMDAR [REFERRED TO]
RISHIPAL SINGH VS. STATE OF U.P. [REFERRED TO]
DR. SUBHASH KASHINATH MAHAJAN VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]
DHRUVARAM MURLIDHAR SONAR VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]
M.SRIKANTH VS. STATE OF TELANGANA [REFERRED TO]
SUSHIL SETHI VS. STATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
SANTOSH PRASAD VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
RAKESH KUMAR YADAV VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the charge sheet no. 1/2019 dated 5th January, 2019 and Cognizance taking order dated 19th July, 2019 passed in Criminal Case No. 3374 of 2019 (State Vs. Arvind and Others), under Sections 323, 504, 506, 376, 377 and 420 I.P.C., Police Station-Surajpur, District-Gautam Budh Nagar, arising out of Case Crime No. 940 of 2018, under Sections 323, 504, 506, 376 and 377 I.P.C., Police Station-Surajpur, District-Gautam Budh Nagar, pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gautam Budh Nagar. The applicants have further prayed for stay of the aforesaid criminal proceedings during the pendency of the present application.

(2.) Heard Mr. Ranjit Saxena, learned counsel for the applicants, Mr. Daya Shanker Pandey, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and Mr. Pankaj Srivastava, learned A.G.A. for the State as well as perused the entire material available on record.

(3.) On the matter being taken up, on 19th October, 2019, a Coordinate Bench of this Court passed following order:

Click here to view full judgment.

ARVIND KUMAR Vs. STATE OF U.P.

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address