REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

ASHA DEVI Appellant

V/S

STATE OF U.P. Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

THOMAS DANA LEO ROY FREY VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
JAWALA RAM VS. STATE OF PEPSU NOW PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
KALYAN SINGH 1 SARDAR SINGH IN PETN NO 180 OF 61 2 LAL SINGH IN PETN NO 181 OF 61 AND 3 BHARAT RAJ SINGH IN PETN NO 205 OF 61 PETITIONERS VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHS :STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
LILY THOMAS VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
DIRECTOR OF SETTLEMENTS A P VS. M R APPARAO [REFERRED TO]
STANDERED CHARTERED BANK VS. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT [REFERRED TO]
LATA SINGH VS. STATE OF U P [REFERRED TO]
S KHUSHBOO VS. KANNIAMMAL [REFERRED TO]
D VELUSAMY VS. D PATCHAIAMMAL [REFERRED TO]
A SUBASH BABU VS. STATE OF A P [REFERRED TO]
PROPRIETARY ARTICLES TRADE ASSOCIATION VS. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA [REFERRED TO]
INDRA SARMA VS. V.K.V.SARMA [REFERRED TO]
SHAYARA BANO VS. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This writ petition has been filed praying for the following reliefs:-

(2.) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are living as husband and wife and both are major and therefore protection may be granted to them so that the respondent no. 4, the father of the petitioner no. 1, may not harass the petitioners. He submits that a representation dated 17.09.2020 was submitted by the petitioner no. 1 before the respondent no.2 but no action has been taken so far.

(3.) Learned Standing Counsel submits that the petitioner no. 2 has taken away the petitioner no. 1 who appears to be duly married wife of one Sri Mahesh Chandra and thus the petitioner no. 2 is an offender and therefore no protection can be granted to the petitioner.

Click here to view full judgment.

ASHA DEVI Vs. STATE OF U.P.

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address