SUNITA Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) To examine correctness of the order dated 21st October, 2020 passed by learned single Bench, this appeal is before us.

(2.) The order aforesaid reads as under:-

(3.) Factual matrix of the case is that on 16th May, 2019 the respondents notified 69000 vacancies relating to the post of Assistant Teacher. The vacancies so notified were to be filled in by way of direct recruitment and for the purpose, a competitive examination i.e. "Assistant Teacher Recruitment Test 2019" was to be conducted. As per the scheme of the process of selection, in the first phase aspirants were to compete the test of 2019 and then to go for counselling. Suffice to state that the counselling is nothing but verification of documents and allotment of district for appointment as per choice and merit of the selected incumbent. To face the test, the aspirants were supposed to submit an application in the prescribed proforma and on qualifying the test they were also supposed to submit a requisition to be called to attend the counselling.