VIMAL SINGH Vs. STATE OF U.P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Dr. V.K. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri S.P. Singh, learned Additional Government Advocate and perused the record.

(2.) By means of the present writ petitioner, the petitioner has prayed for the followed main relief:-

(3.) Learned counsel for petitioner while challenging the impugned F.I.R. submits that from the bare perusal of the impugned F.I.R. the position which emerged out is that the crime in question has been committed by one Arpan Shukla and his friends (not named in the F.I.R.) and there is no evidence whatsoever to the effect that petitioner is involved in the crime.