DIPENDRA KUMAR SINGH Vs. STATE OF U.P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The present revision is moved to seek interference of court in the impugned order dated 31.7.2019 on the ground of illegality, irregularity and arbitrariness committed by the Trial Judge in S.T No.467/2016, Crime Case No. 299/2016 registered under Sections 147 , 148 , 149 , 504 , 506 , 307 and 302 I.P.C. in Police Station-Jamo, District Amethi (State of U.P. Vs. Shivendra Pratap Singh and Anr.) allowing the application of informant of the case under Section 319 Cr.P.C. By the said order the revisionist, proposed accused is summoned for trial along with the other named accused in the First Information Report of the incidence and charge-sheeted by the police after investigation.

(2.) Heard learned counsel Sri S.P. Singh, Advocate appearing on behalf of the revisionist (the proposed accused), learned counsel Sri S.K. Singh, Advocate appearing on behalf of the complainant and for prosecution, learned A.G.A Sri Abhay Kumar, Advocate.

(3.) The crux of the argument delivered by learned counsel Sri S.P. Singh are that-