FAHEEM KHAN Vs. STATE OF U.P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Mr. Amir Khan, learned counsel for applicants, learned A.G.A. representing opposite party No. 1 and Mr. Vahid Zamal, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Babban Singh, learned counsel representing opposite party No. 2.

(2.) This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed challenging charge sheet No. 16 of 2013, dated 18.05.2013 submitted in Case Crime No. 5 of 2013, under Sections 498-A , 323 , 504 , 506 IPC and Sections 3 / 4 Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Mahila Thana, District Badaun and the entire proceedings of consequential State Case No. 2526 of 2013 (State Vs. Faheem Khan and others) under Sections 498-A , 323 , 504 , 506 IPC and Sections 3 / 4 Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Mahila Thana, District Badaun, pending in the Court of C.J.M., Badaun.

(3.) In compliance of order dated 3.9.2013, no counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of opposite party No. 2.