SANJEEV RAWAT Vs. STATE OF U.P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Petitioner's earlier Writ Petition No.45598 of 2012 came to be disposed of vide following orders passed on 16.1.2019:-

(2.) It is pursuant to this order that petitioner's claim has been considered by the Consolidation Commissioner vide order impugned in this petition dated 16.10.2019. This order records that juniors to petition since have been promoted on 22.12.2016, as such notional promotion has been granted to petitioner from that date and benefit of regular promotion has been extended to him from 10.6.2017 when an order of promotion was actually passed in his favour. It is this order which is assailed in this petition.

(3.) Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was already promoted in the year 2013 and all benefits were given to him on the promotional post at that stage. Submission is that in the year 2016 when claim of others was considered the respondents overlooked petitioner's claim only on the ground that certain entries were not made available by the department concerned. It is stated that for such reasons petitioner cannot be made to suffer. Submission is that all benefits as have been extended to petitioner's juniors are liable to have been extended to the petitioner also.