REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

Suhel Ahmad Appellant

V/S

STATE OF U.P. Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

SMT. SEEMA SARKAR V. THE STATE [REFERRED TO]
MAQBOOL HUSSAIN VS. STATE OF BOMBAY [REFERRED TO]
OM PARKASH GUPTA RAM GOBIND SINGH VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH:STATE OF VINDHYA PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH VS. VEERESHWAR RAO AGNIHOTRI [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF BOMBAY VS. S L APTE [REFERRED TO]
ROSHAN LAL VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
M C MEHTA VS. KAMAL NATH [REFERRED TO]
INTELLECTUALS FORUM TIRUPATHI VS. STATE OF A P [REFERRED TO]
INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA VS. VIMAL KUMAR SURANA [REFERRED TO]
SENGOL VS. STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE R S MANGALAM POLICE STATION [REFERRED TO]
LALITA KUMARI VS. GOVT. OF U.P. [REFERRED TO]
MANOHAR LAL SHARMA VS. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR VS. SAYYED HASSAN SAYYED SUBHAN & ORS [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) On oral prayer, learned counsel for the applicant is permitted to correct prayer clause of the application during course of the day.

(2.) This application under Section 482 CrPC has been filed with the prayer to quash the charge-sheet as well as the entire proceedings in Case No. 1803 of 2019, arising out of Case Crime No. 193 of 2019, under Sections 379 IPC and 4/21 Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act , (in short 'the Mines and Minerals Act ') Police Station Dhebarua, District Siddharth Nagar and bailable warrant dated 22.10.2019, pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siddharth Nagar and further to stay further proceedings of the aforesaid case.

(3.) Since pure legal issues are involved in this case and the facts as emerges on record are not disputed ,therefore, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the instant case is being decided at the admission stage itself without calling counter affidavit.

Click here to view full judgment.

SUHEL AHMAD Vs. STATE OF U.P.

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address