OM PRAKASH Vs. STATE OF U.P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner has preferred the present Public Interest Litigation (in short PIL) with the following prayers:-

(2.) After various orders were passed by this Court in the present Public Interest Litigation from time to time. It appears from perusal of the record that a budget has been allocated by the District Administration for maintenance of the smarak. Taken into consideration the aforesaid aspect of the matter a detailed order was passed by this Court on 08.05.2019 is reproduced below:-

(3.) The above quoted orders clearly indicates that the earlier instructions dated 27.9.2018 have already been considered by this Court and it is only thereafter, when the instructions were found to be not satisfactory, learned Standing Counsel was directed to produce the record on the next date fixed. Today, learned Standing counsel has failed to produce the record as already directed by this Court. Shri Upadhyaya, learned counsel appearing for the Gaon Sabha is not present and no counter affidavit has been filed.