JAI MOHAN Vs. STATE OF U.P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Sri Nirankar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Dr. Udai Veer Singh, learned Addl. C.S.C. for the State-respondents.

(2.) At the very outset the learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn attention of this Court towards Annexure no. 11 which is a judgment and order dated 7.10.2015 in Service Bench No. 155/2013: Jai Mohan and 2 others vs. State of U.P. and others by submitting that the said writ petition was filed by the petitioner making prayer mainly to the effect that the opposite parties be directed to pay the salary to the petitioner on the basis of pay scale which was drawn by the petitioners on the date of retrenchment in the erstwhile department. This Court in the aforesaid writ petition has considered the facts and circumstances of the issue in detail. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that after hearing the learned counsel for the parties this Court has finally allowed the writ petition issuing a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to pay the salary to the petitioner on the basis of pay-scale which was drawn by the petitioner on the basis of their retrenchment in the erstwhile department. For the brevity the order dated 7.10.2015 is being reproduced herein below:

(3.) Regard being had to the aforesaid discussions, we hereby issue a writ of mandamus to the respondents to pay salary to the petitioners on the basis of the pay scale, which was drawn by the petitioners on the day of their retrenchment in the erstwhile department.