RAM BADAL Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri Dilip Srivastava, learned counsel for the revisionist, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record.

(2.) NO notice is issued to private opposite party in view of the order proposed to be passed today, however, liberty is reserved for private opposite party to apply for variation or modification of this order if he feels so aggrieved.

(3.) ON the basis of statement of the complainant and the witnesses recorded under Sections 200 and 202 Cr.P.C., learned Magistrate summoned the accused to face trial under Section 379 IPC.