KAMAL JI Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Sri Ram Yash Pandey, learned Counsel for the petitioners, Sri A. C. Tripathi, learned Counsel for the respondents.

(2.) In the present case, the petitioners are seeking the following reliefs:

(3.) The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner is running a travelling video cinema in the name of Puja Video Hall and Deepak Video Hall. The travelling video cinema is defined under Section 2(h) of U.P. Cinema (Regulation of Exhibition by means of Video) Rules, 1988 means a video cinema which gives exhibition by means of video in a temporary building. The petitioner has been granted licence on 14.2.2009 for the period 17.2.2009 to 16.8.2009 for the period of six months. Thereafter, the licence was further extended on 18.8.2009 for the period of 17.8.2009 to 16.2.2010 for the period of six months.