SURESH CHANDRA Vs. STATE OF UP

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel.

(2.) THE petitioner has come up with a prayer for a mandamus commanding the respondents to pay the petitioner the Leave Encashment benefits as indicated in the order of Executive Engineer dated 12.9.2006, Annexure-4 to the writ petition. It is submitted that entitlement of the petitioner has been found but the same has not been actually paid to the petitioner.

(3.) LEARNED Standing Counsel, therefore, submits that in view of the aforesaid provision made in the Government Order, the petitioner's relief as prayed for cannot be granted.