SAKET KUMAR ALIAS BABLU Vs. STATE OF UP

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the revisionist and learned AGA for the State.

(2.) THIS is a revision against the order dated 20.9.2008 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge/ FT. C. No. Ist, Banda in misc. case No. 5/XII/08 arising out of S.T. No. 77 of 2002 (State v. Raju and others).

(3.) LEARNED counsel for the revisionist submitted that the learned Additional Sessions Judge disbelieved the aforesaid evidence on the ground that the age disclosed by the revisionist during his examination under Section 313 Cr.P.C. was somehow different and on the basis of that disclosure which was made on 12.10.2006, the revisionist was held more than 18 years on the date of the occurrence. The learned Additional Sessions Judge further found that the revisionist had not claimed juvenility in the bail application dated 22.10.2001 moved by him.