(1.) The facts giving rise to this writ petition lies in a narrow campus.
(2.) The order of the Collector dated 16.11.2009 for initiating suo motu action for cancellation of the allotment/lease of the petitioners and the order of the Board of Revenue dated 24.12.2009 dismissing the revision have been assailed in this writ petition.
(3.) I have heard Sri S.N. Pandey, learned Counsel for petitioners, learned standing counsel for respondents No. 1 and 2 and Sri D.D. Chauhan who has appeared for respondent No. 3 and with their consent proceed to decide the writ petition on merits at this stage itself.