VINOD KUMAR Vs. STATE OF U.P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) WITH the consent of the learned Counsel for the par­ties, this revision is disposed of at this stage.

(2.) IT appears that in case crime No. 582 of 2009, under sections 304-B, 201, 506 I.P.C. and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Chhaprauli, District Baghpat, the police submitted a final report, against which the revisionist moved a protest petition. The learned Chief Judicial Magistrate rejected the protest petition and accepted the final report vide his order dated 11.6.2010, which has been impugned in this revision.

(3.) IN view of the fact that the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate has passed a de­tailed order on the basis of the materials on record, I do not find it proper to interfere with the matter, therefore, the revision is dismissed. However, it will be open to the revisionist to file a complaint before the competent Court which shall be dealt with in accordance with law and a proper order thereon shall be passed without being in­fluenced from any of the observations made either by this Court or by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, while accepting the final report.