SHASHI PRABHA SRIVASTAVA Vs. SURYA PAL SINGH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD counsel for the parties and perused the record.

(2.) THIS writ petition is preferred by the tenant challenging the validity and correctness of the order dated 23.3.2010 passed by the appellate Court/Addl. District Judge-13, Kanpur in Rent Appeal No. 66 of 2009, Suryapal Singh v. Shashi Prabha Srivsstava and others, as well as the judgment and order dated 24-5-2001 passed by the aforesaid appellate authority appended as Annexure No. 16 and 17 respectively to the writ petition. The petitioner has prayed for quashing of the aforesaid order on the ground that the orders are illegal.

(3.) IT appears that the tenant suggested in his written statement that the landlord has two rooms in his possession on the ground floor whereas in fact he had only in possession of one room behind the shop of the petitioner in which the landlord is doing his business; that the tenant has described the portion of mezzanine floor as one very big hall.