JAGAT PAL Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri S.K. Chaubey, learned counsel for the revisionist, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the impugned order.

(2.) NO notice is issued to private opposite party in view of the order proposed to be passed today, however, liberty is reserved for private opposite party to apply for variation or modification of this order if he feels so aggrieved.

(3.) LEARNED Additional Sessions Judge rejected the aforesaid applications on the ground that the result sheet, progress report and school leaving certificates show the date of birth of the accused - revisionist to be 26th June, 1976, but all these three documents are photo stat copies, which are not admissible in evidence and consequently the applications were rejected.