REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

VIJAY KUMAR UPADHYAY Appellant

V/S

A.D.J., LUCKNOW Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

MUNNA LAL AND OTHERS V. 3RDADJ,ETAWAH [REFERRED TO]
LATA RAM AVATARS. IINDADJ,BULANDSHAHAR [REFERRED TO]
DHAJJA RAM V. 6TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE,MUZAFFARNAGAR AND OTHERS [REFERRED TO]
MOHAMMAD SHAHNAWAZ AKHTAR VS. IST ADJ VARANASI [REFERRED TO]
MAHESH CHANDRA BARNWAL VS. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE HARIDWAR [REFERRED TO]
RAJ BAHADUR SINGH VS. DISTRICT JUDGE FATEHPUR [REFERRED TO]
MOHD ILYAS AHMAD VS. XIIITH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE ALLAHABAD [REFERRED TO]
HABIB AHMAD VS. VTH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE MUZAFFARNAGAR [REFERRED TO]
SATISH CHAND KAKKAR VS. VII ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE [DISTINGUISHED]
RAM SWARUP VS. UMA SHANKAR [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) By means of present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the judgment and order dated 21.10.2009, passed by the Additional District Judge, Lucknow and the order dated 04.04.2008, passed by the Judge Small Causes Court, Lucknow.

(2.) Heard Sri R.N. Gupta assisted by Sri Pankaj Gupta, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Jaspreet Singh, learned Counsel for the opposite parties No. 3 to 8.

(3.) The facts, in brief, as submitted by the learned Counsel for the petitioner, are that the controversy in the present case relates to a premises bearing No. 227/24/25, Astabal Yahiyaganj, Lucknow, owned by Late Sri Badri Prasad Gupta and Smt. Raj Kumari (here-in-after referred to as the premises in dispute). The boundaries of premises, in dispute, are as under:

Click here to view full judgment.

VIJAY KUMAR UPADHYAY Vs. ADJ LUCKNOW

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address