SHRINATH Vs. SUMAN SARIN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) By means of the present writ petition the petitioner has approached this Court for issuance of a writ of certiorari quashing the order dated 12.11.2010 (Annexure No. 15) passed by the District Judge, in Review Application (Misc. Case No. 335 of 2010) and also the impugned release order dated 14.8.2009 passed by the Prescribed Authority, Mathura in P.A. Case No. 17 of 2008 as well as judgment and order dated 10.8.2010 passed by the District Judge, Mathura in P.A. Appeal No. 21 of 2009. The brief facts of the case are as follows:

(2.) During the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner and respondent have mutually agreed to resolve their differences and entered into a compromise and in pursuance thereof, the petitioner (Tenant) and the respondent (Landlady) have filed their joint affidavits dated 20.12.2010 before this Court today which is taken on record. Both the parties have been identified by their respective Counsel namely Sri Rahul Sahai, Advocate and Sri Nirvikar Gupta, Advocate.

(3.) For ready reference, the terms and conditions as mentioned in paragraph 5 of the joint affidavit dated 20.12.2010, filed by the parries in this writ petition, are reproduced blow:--