RAGHVENDRA KUMAR MISHRA Vs. STATE OF UP

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri AMIT CHADHA, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Suresh Panjwani, learned Standing Counsel on behalf of the respondents.

(2.) BY means of present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the impugned orders dated 20/12/2002(Annexure No. 4) and 4/3/2006(Annexure No. 5) passed by the District Magistrate, Gonda and Commissioner Devi Patan Mandal, Gonda respectively.

(3.) HE further submits that the sole reason on the basis of which licence of the petitioner has been cancelled is an FIR which was lodged against him on 4.9.2002. In the said FIR, the petitioner was not named, even in the incident in question in which FIR was lodged and a case No. 146 of 2002 {State v. Raghvendra Mishra) was registered in which Police filed a final report.