ABHAY KUMAR PANDEY Vs. STATE OF UP

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.GA. appearing for the State.

(2.) THE relief sought in this petition is for quashing of the F.I.R. registered at Case Crime No.-1501 of 2010, under sections 419,420 and 406,I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali Khalilabad, district Ghaziabad.

(3.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner argued that the person who took the informant's card should be there in the closed circuit camera. If there was a camera in the booth, if the picture of the person who took the informant's card and pressed the buttons was clear, then it could also be utilized for verifying the correctness of the prosecution version in the investigation. It provides no ground for quashing the F.I.R. or staying the arrest at this stage.