VINOD KUMAR Vs. UNION OF INDIA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) LIST revised. None appeared for the petitioner. Sri Govind Saran, learned counsel for the respondents is present. I have perused the record and have also heard Sri Govind Saran at length.

(2.) THESE four writ petitions involve common question of fact and law and, therefore, are being considered and decided finally by this common judgment under the Rules of the Court at this stage as agreed by learned counsel for the respondents.

(3.) AGGRIEVED by these two orders which required the petitioner to give option for absorption of the feeder cadre, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.