(1.) HEARD Dr. Y.K. Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel for the appellant. No one appears for the respondent in the revised call. ,
(2.) THE State of U.P. is aggrieved by the judgment dated 10/2/2004 in Writ Petition No. 39982 of 1993, by which the writ petition has been allowed to the extent that late Shri Radha Charan lal's services rendered by him in Cooperative Union have been directed to be added in his total length of service as Assistant Development Officer for terminal benefits and pension. During the pendency of the writ petition late Radha Charan Lal died on 7/2/1999. His widow Smt. Prema Devi has been substituted in his place.
(3.) IN State of U.P. and others v. Permanand Srivastava, 2009 (4) ADJ 568 (DB), relying upon a judgment of Supreme Court in State of U.P. and others v. Ruk Mangal Singh Rathaur, (2006) 13 SCC 662, it was held by this Court that on the clear intendment of the legislature the services rendered as Cooperative Supervisor in Cooperative Union under the Cooperative Regulations do not carry pensionary benefits. The Cooperative Supervisors are under the control of Cooperative Federation Authority.