LAWS(ALL)-2010-9-391

RAKHI Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

Decided On September 01, 2010
RAKHI Appellant
V/S
State of U.P. and Ors. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner, who had appeared at the examination for selection to the post of Constable conducted by the U.P. Police Recruitment and Promotion Board, is aggrieved by her non -selection.

(2.) IT is stated that the petitioner belongs to the OBC female category and has obtained 76.1256 marks but she was not selected even though persons having lesser marks than the petitioner have been selected.

(3.) THE allegations made in the petition that marks have not been properly awarded are very vague and since the answer books have been checked by the OMR Scanner, there is no scope for any mistake in the marks awarded to the petitioner. The apprehension of the petitioner that marks have not been properly given is, therefore, without any basis. This apart, in the absence of any provision for revaluation of the answer books, it is not possible to issue any direction for revaluation of the answer books. The learned Standing Counsel has also pointed out that marks have been uniformly awarded to all the candidates for the wrong questions and that the petitioner was not selected as she did not clear Part I Part II of the paper. In such circumstances, no relief can be granted to the petitioner.