MANOJ KUMAR SHUKLA Vs. ADDITIONAL CITY MAGISTRATE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) By means of the present writ petition the petitioner has challenged the orders dated 30.5.2009 (Annexure No. 4), 2.7.2009 (Annexure No. 6) passed by the respondent No. 1, Additional City Magistrate 2nd/Rent Control and Eviction Officer, Kanpur Nagar and order dated 21.10.2010 (Annexure No. 9) passed by the Additional District Judge, Court No. 13, Kanpur Nagar in the Rent Revision No. 35 of 2010. The brief facts of the case are as follows;

(2.) Learned Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the premises was inspected by the Rent Control Inspector behind his back without giving any notice to the petitioner and the order declaring the vacancy of, the said premises has also been passed ex parte in violation of the principles of natural justice. He further submits that the petitioner is a tenant of the disputed premises and is entitled for the benefit as provided under section 14 of the Act.

(3.) Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and perused the material available on record.