ATAR SINGH Vs. DISTRICT JUDGE, GHAZIABAD & ORS.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) IN spite of sufficient service, no one has appeared on behalf of respondent No. 3, the only contesting respondent.

(2.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner.

(3.) RESTORATION application under Order IX, Rule 13, C.P.C. was accompanied by appli­cation for condonation of delay under Sec-tion-5, Limitation Act.