SUMIT GUPTA Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri V.C.Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Nimai Das, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.

(2.) NECESSARY pleadings have been exchanged between the parties and counsel for the parties agree for final disposal of the writ petition at admission stage itself.

(3.) THE aforesaid two orders have been assailed by the petitioner in the present writ petition, on one of the grounds that the first floor portion of the property was residential in nature and, therefore, the authorities under the Act have erred in valuing the said portion as commercial.