REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

RAHMAT ULLAH Appellant

V/S

AZIZ AHMAD Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

PIPER V. HARVEY [REFERRED TO]
M/S INDIA PIPE FITTING COMPANY VS. FAKRUDDIN M.A. BAKER AND ANOTHER [REFERRED TO]
GULAB BAI VS. NALIN NARSIMONIA [REFERRED TO]
SMT. TARA DEVI VS. DISTRICT JUDGE AND OTHERS [REFERRED TO]
RULEMUDDIN AND OTHERS VS. ABDUL NADEEM [REFERRED TO]
MATTULAL VS. RADHE LAL [REFERRED TO]
BEGA BEGUM VS. ABDUL AHAD KHAN DEAD [REFERRED TO]
PRATIVA DEVI VS. T V KRISHNAN [REFERRED TO]
SHIV SARUP GUPTA VS. MAHESH CHAND GUPTA [REFERRED TO]
BADRINARAYAN CHUNILAL BHUTADA VS. GOVINDRAM RAMGOPAL MUNDADA [REFERRED TO]
BADRINARAYAN CHUNILAL BHUTADA VS. GOVINDRAM RAMGOPAL MUNDADA [REFERRED TO]
PRAMOD KUMAR VERMA VS. VI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE BIJNOR [REFERRED TO]
SALIM KHAN VS. IVTH ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE JHANSI [REFERRED TO]
MOHABBEY ALI VS. TEJ BAHADUR [REFERRED TO]
RAJ KUMAR VS. LAL KHAN [REFERRED TO]
Ashis Kumar and another VS. Prescribed Authority and another [REFERRED TO]
JAGDISH CHANDRA VS. DISTRICT JUDGE AND ORS. [REFERRED TO]
JAI RAJ AGARWAL VS. BHOLA NATH KAPOOR AND OTHERS [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) By means of present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the orders dated 27.03.1990 and 10.05.1995 (Annexure Nos. 5 & 7 to the writ petition) passed by respondent Nos. 2 & 3 respectively.

(2.) Heard Sri J.P. Mathur, learned counsel for the petitioners, Yogesh Kesarwani, learned counsel for the contesting respondent No. 3.

(3.) Controversy involved in the present case relates to the House No. 43 situated at Shankarpuri Colony, Phool Bagh, P.S. Qaiserbagh, Lucknow, Late Sri Rahmat Ullah and Smt. Ummatunnisa (petitioner Nos. 1 & 2) are owners/landlords and Respondent No. 1 i.e. Late Aziz Ahmad was tenant in the said House on monthly rent of Rs. 18/- per month.

Click here to view full judgment.

RAHMAT ULLAH Vs. AZIZ AHMAD

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address