(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
(2.) THIS writ petition has been filed challenging the order, rejecting the application of the petitioner for cross-examination of certain witnesses of the landlord who had filed affidavits in his support in the court below.
(3.) THEREAFTER , an application was moved on 4.2.2008 by the petitioner with the prayer that since there is discrepancy in the affidavits of witnesses produced on behalf of the landlady, they may be summoned for cross-examination. Objections were filed by the landlady to the aforesaid application and after hearing the parties. The court below vide its order dated 21.2.2008 rejected the application of the petitioner on the ground that the said application for cross-examination has no substance and appears to have been moved only with the purpose to delay the final decision in the case.