RAJ KUMAR SINGH Vs. STATE OF UP

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri N.C. Rajvanshi, learned Senior Counsel for the appellant and learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3.

(2.) THE appellant herein was one of the writ petitioners. THE writ petition being Writ Petition No. 13503 of 1994 was filed praying for payment of salary on the ground that he had been appointed and his appointment was in accordance with law and an interim order was passed in the writ petition. THEreafter the writ petition appears to have been taken up on 16.9.1997 on which date the same was dismissed and the interim order was discharged. THE order passed by the learned Single Judge is quoted below:

(3.) HAVING entertained the said application, the learned Judge thereafter proceeded to reject the same on the ground that the affidavit filed in support of the restoration application makes vague assertions with regard to the knowledge of dismissal of the writ petition. Accordingly, the restoration application was rejected against which the present appeal has been preferred.